Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32671 - 32680 of 58542 for speedy trial.

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
of conviction on the ground that the defendant was not mentally competent at the time of his trial or sentencing
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=694&year=2015

[PDF] NOTICE
of the Manufacturers. Thomas contends he is entitled to a new trial because of flaws in the verdict form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57879 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” Hume further opined that medication would likely render Mary competent to stand trial because Mary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062400 - 2026-01-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” Hume further opined that medication would likely render Mary competent to stand trial because Mary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062401 - 2026-01-13

[PDF] WI APP 112
, seriously injuring the car driver, Ronald Dakter. At trial, the No. 2013AP1750 2 jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123530 - 2017-09-21

WI App 112 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1750 Complete Title o...
collided with a car, seriously injuring the car driver, Ronald Dakter. At trial, the jury returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123530 - 2014-11-17

[PDF] Frontsheet
of conviction taken against Stanley J. Maday Jr. ("Maday") and which granted Maday a new trial. State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187299 - 2017-09-21

State v. Joseph L. Kohls
interfering with the trial court's sentencing discretion. See State v. Mosley, 201 Wis. 2d 36, 43, 547 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2687 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 23, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant as a third offense. Fex contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60272 - 2011-02-22

COURT OF APPEALS
and Dale Wiesner’s property. After a trial to the court, the court ruled that the Dorshas had proved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33850 - 2008-08-27