Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32691 - 32700 of 58508 for speedy trial.
Search results 32691 - 32700 of 58508 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 185, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994); (3) he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955231 - 2025-05-13
-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 185, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994); (3) he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955231 - 2025-05-13
COURT OF APPEALS
on appeal. Brewer’s trial counsel explained at the start of the suppression hearing that if Brewer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82117 - 2012-05-07
on appeal. Brewer’s trial counsel explained at the start of the suppression hearing that if Brewer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82117 - 2012-05-07
[PDF]
State v. Steven J. Arthur
for his commitment as a sexually violent person under ch. 980. Prior to trial, the State filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4528 - 2017-09-19
for his commitment as a sexually violent person under ch. 980. Prior to trial, the State filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4528 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial counsel was constitutionally defective for failing to object to the breach. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182419 - 2017-09-21
trial counsel was constitutionally defective for failing to object to the breach. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182419 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dale Phillippi v. Duane Becker
, and their employees. WIS. STAT. § 893.80(3). The Phillippis first argue that the trial court erred by rejecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16149 - 2017-09-21
, and their employees. WIS. STAT. § 893.80(3). The Phillippis first argue that the trial court erred by rejecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16149 - 2017-09-21
Kari K. Stuckel v. Mildred K. Olsen
, filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court later granted. Kari and Jennifer appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7138 - 2005-03-31
, filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court later granted. Kari and Jennifer appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7138 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Excel Engineering, Inc. and Signature Homes by Adashun Jones, Inc.[1] after a jury trial. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51717 - 2010-07-06
Excel Engineering, Inc. and Signature Homes by Adashun Jones, Inc.[1] after a jury trial. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51717 - 2010-07-06
State v. Patrick B.
. ANDERSON, J. The State appeals from the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12291 - 2005-03-31
. ANDERSON, J. The State appeals from the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12291 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patrick B.
. ANDERSON, J. The State appeals from the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12290 - 2005-03-31
. ANDERSON, J. The State appeals from the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12290 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert L. Flick
, 558 N.W.2d 642 (Ct. App. 1996), the trial court correctly rejected his claim. Therefore, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14844 - 2005-03-31
, 558 N.W.2d 642 (Ct. App. 1996), the trial court correctly rejected his claim. Therefore, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14844 - 2005-03-31