Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3271 - 3280 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3271 - 3280 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion to suppress both the fanny pack evidence and Goines’s custodial statement.6 ¶10 Goines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=979187 - 2025-07-08
the motion to suppress both the fanny pack evidence and Goines’s custodial statement.6 ¶10 Goines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=979187 - 2025-07-08
[PDF]
WI APP 255
the circuit court’s order denying him sentence credit for time spent in custody in Illinois as the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30753 - 2014-09-15
the circuit court’s order denying him sentence credit for time spent in custody in Illinois as the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30753 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 255
in custody in Illinois as the result of both a Wisconsin fugitive warrant issued in this case and an arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30753 - 2007-12-18
in custody in Illinois as the result of both a Wisconsin fugitive warrant issued in this case and an arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30753 - 2007-12-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in custody from the date of his arrest until the date that he was revoked and ordered to serve his prison
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248856 - 2019-10-16
in custody from the date of his arrest until the date that he was revoked and ordered to serve his prison
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248856 - 2019-10-16
State v. Stephen E. Lee
. The trial court denied the motion. The trial court held that Lee was in custody pursuant to a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14485 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court denied the motion. The trial court held that Lee was in custody pursuant to a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14485 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
by denying his pretrial motion to suppress statements. We reject Zarm’s arguments and affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28785 - 2007-04-23
by denying his pretrial motion to suppress statements. We reject Zarm’s arguments and affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28785 - 2007-04-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
County Circuit Court cases. Zarm argues the trial court erred by denying his pretrial motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28785 - 2014-09-15
County Circuit Court cases. Zarm argues the trial court erred by denying his pretrial motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28785 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Marathon County conviction, but he was not immediately taken into custody. On March 12, 2018, Simon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364296 - 2021-05-11
Marathon County conviction, but he was not immediately taken into custody. On March 12, 2018, Simon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364296 - 2021-05-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
orders denying his motion 1 This appeal is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31958 - 2014-09-15
orders denying his motion 1 This appeal is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31958 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
WIS. STAT. § 974.06 1 motion to withdraw his guilty plea. He contends his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124663 - 2017-09-21
WIS. STAT. § 974.06 1 motion to withdraw his guilty plea. He contends his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124663 - 2017-09-21