Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3271 - 3280 of 6659 for mix.

Lyle Zabel v. Kenneth Doepker
” the original covenant. This is not a pure finding of fact. In reviewing mixed questions, the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14107 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
466, 634 N.W.2d 325. ¶13 A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel presents a mixed question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191100 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Lavelle W.
comprehend what is going on, and thus hinders the ability to get a feel for the proceedings—a mix
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20169 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Whether a defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234280 - 2019-02-07

[PDF] State v. Eric Pittman
assistance of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact.” State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13994 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dane County Department of Human Services v. Johnnie B.P.
. The trial also contained a mixed bag of information about the nature of the relationship between Johnnie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2740 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Johnny L. Hampton
prejudicial as to warrant a mistrial. Our standard of review relative to the constitutional claim is mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12124 - 2017-09-21

Dane County Department of Human Services v. Kenneth M.
Whether trial counsel provided ineffective assistance is a mixed question of law and fact. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20284 - 2005-11-16

COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶11 Our review of an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim presents mixed questions of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56991 - 2010-11-22

COURT OF APPEALS
frivolously presents a mixed question of fact and law. See Storms, 309 Wis. 2d 704, ¶35. What the litigant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85730 - 2012-08-07