Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3271 - 3280 of 59312 for quit claim deed.

COURT OF APPEALS
ever claimed the sanctions proceeding against Jimenez was a contempt proceeding. Neither the court nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59236 - 2011-01-24

State v. Andrae T. D'Acquisto
that hunting closed at 4:38 p.m., that he quit hunting at 4:20 p.m. and that it was typical for him to stay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16118 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
claimed the sanctions proceeding against Jimenez was a contempt proceeding. Neither the court nor Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59236 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. James M.C.
judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(e), STATS. No. 97-3505 2 property. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13335 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Anthony. It said he had “not quite accepted the sex offender treatment that probably he got at some
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350381 - 2021-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
claims.’” State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶18, 294 Wis. 2d 62, 716 N.W.2d 886 (quoted source omitted).3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366652 - 2021-05-13

State v. Tracy D. Reynolds
under the influence of intoxicants (OMVWI), contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. Reynolds claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11491 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
facts stated on the record so as to allow meaningful appellate review. The reason for this claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69297 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Miguel A. Segarra
. ¶5 Segarra brought a motion to suppress the cocaine, claiming that the police did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6828 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Norbert J. Maday
and therefore the liar the defense claimed he was. However, Maday ignores that the evidence about the video
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8775 - 2017-09-19