Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32701 - 32710 of 83513 for case code.
Search results 32701 - 32710 of 83513 for case code.
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Jacobson
case. The State submitted that another officer was present when Alvin gave the statement, Ronald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6720 - 2017-09-20
case. The State submitted that another officer was present when Alvin gave the statement, Ronald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6720 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that if his case were to be tried again, Mr. Taylor’s testimony could be pivotal, for at least two reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145216 - 2017-09-21
that if his case were to be tried again, Mr. Taylor’s testimony could be pivotal, for at least two reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145216 - 2017-09-21
State v. Roger S. Walker
2006 WI 82 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2004AP2820-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25753 - 2006-06-29
2006 WI 82 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2004AP2820-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25753 - 2006-06-29
State v. Antonio M. Perkins
.” Id. at 36, 291 N.W.2d at 806. The two counts in this case were based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9062 - 2005-03-31
.” Id. at 36, 291 N.W.2d at 806. The two counts in this case were based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9062 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 905.10(3)(b) (2011-12).1 For the reasons we explain below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94658 - 2014-09-15
in this case, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 905.10(3)(b) (2011-12).1 For the reasons we explain below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94658 - 2014-09-15
Wisconsin Seafood Company, Inc. v. David P. Fisher
. If such factual issues exist, summary judgment is improper and the case should be tried. Magnum Radio, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5481 - 2005-03-31
. If such factual issues exist, summary judgment is improper and the case should be tried. Magnum Radio, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5481 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lawrence M. Ventrice
, and the case proceeded to trial. On the second day of trial, the court ruled that Ventrice could not assert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4042 - 2005-03-31
, and the case proceeded to trial. On the second day of trial, the court ruled that Ventrice could not assert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4042 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
2010 WI App 23 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP40 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45600 - 2010-02-23
2010 WI App 23 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP40 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45600 - 2010-02-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pseudonyms, rather than their initials or names. 3 Cases appealed under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.107 “shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=549631 - 2022-07-28
pseudonyms, rather than their initials or names. 3 Cases appealed under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.107 “shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=549631 - 2022-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Charles J. Benoit
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1531-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14079 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1531-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14079 - 2014-09-15