Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32701 - 32710 of 41998 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 32701 - 32710 of 41998 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an explanation to the jury of why it should not expect DNA evidence in this case and why absence of DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87370 - 2014-09-15
an explanation to the jury of why it should not expect DNA evidence in this case and why absence of DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87370 - 2014-09-15
State v. Keith S. Betts
affirm the trial court's order. In 1989, a jury convicted Betts of armed robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8005 - 2005-03-31
affirm the trial court's order. In 1989, a jury convicted Betts of armed robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8005 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
had the discretion to refile the charges. A jury convicted Young
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=421986 - 2021-09-08
had the discretion to refile the charges. A jury convicted Young
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=421986 - 2021-09-08
State v. Kenneth Neu
intoxicated pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). The judgment followed a jury’s guilty verdict.[2] Neu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16044 - 2005-03-31
intoxicated pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). The judgment followed a jury’s guilty verdict.[2] Neu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16044 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Keith S. Betts
, we affirm the trial court's order. In 1989, a jury convicted Betts of armed robbery and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8005 - 2017-09-19
, we affirm the trial court's order. In 1989, a jury convicted Betts of armed robbery and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8005 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gerald Heckathorn
to this prosecution. ¶5 One day before Heckathorn’s jury trial, his attorney filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17824 - 2005-05-02
to this prosecution. ¶5 One day before Heckathorn’s jury trial, his attorney filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17824 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
the validity of the test. The motion was denied. Larsen was found guilty after a jury trial. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30075 - 2014-09-15
the validity of the test. The motion was denied. Larsen was found guilty after a jury trial. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30075 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for exercising his right to a jury trial; (2) the circuit court said that Oswald knew the witnesses who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89195 - 2014-09-15
for exercising his right to a jury trial; (2) the circuit court said that Oswald knew the witnesses who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89195 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jerry McMahon
, the court established that McMahon understood and waived his rights to a jury trial, confrontation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13061 - 2017-09-21
, the court established that McMahon understood and waived his rights to a jury trial, confrontation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13061 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of occasions it was the jury that found him guilty …. This Court intended in referencing that to speak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123121 - 2017-09-21
of occasions it was the jury that found him guilty …. This Court intended in referencing that to speak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123121 - 2017-09-21