Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32701 - 32710 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 32701 - 32710 of 58506 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
to a new trial because the State knowingly used perjured testimony to convict him, and he did not receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30952 - 2007-11-20
to a new trial because the State knowingly used perjured testimony to convict him, and he did not receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30952 - 2007-11-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for a new trial. He contends that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70432 - 2014-09-15
his motion for a new trial. He contends that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70432 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supporting his conviction following a jury trial for possession of a firearm by a felon. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219216 - 2018-09-18
supporting his conviction following a jury trial for possession of a firearm by a felon. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219216 - 2018-09-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on appeal. After a jury trial, Russell was convicted of four counts of second-degree sexual assault, two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311557 - 2020-12-10
on appeal. After a jury trial, Russell was convicted of four counts of second-degree sexual assault, two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311557 - 2020-12-10
[PDF]
Daniel J.R. LaCount v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
$500,000 per occurrence limit of liability. The trial court concluded that paragraph (a) of the omnibus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7111 - 2017-09-20
$500,000 per occurrence limit of liability. The trial court concluded that paragraph (a) of the omnibus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7111 - 2017-09-20
State v. William C. Rosenberg
] and of bail jumping in violation of Wis. Stat. § 946.49(1)(a). Rosenberg contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2764 - 2005-03-31
] and of bail jumping in violation of Wis. Stat. § 946.49(1)(a). Rosenberg contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2764 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Excel Engineering, Inc. and Signature Homes by Adashun Jones, Inc.[1] after a jury trial. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51717 - 2010-07-06
Excel Engineering, Inc. and Signature Homes by Adashun Jones, Inc.[1] after a jury trial. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51717 - 2010-07-06
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Schweiner
and argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing an unduly harsh sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7515 - 2017-09-19
and argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing an unduly harsh sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7515 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his plea involuntary and unknowing and that his trial and appellate attorneys were ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79043 - 2014-09-15
his plea involuntary and unknowing and that his trial and appellate attorneys were ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79043 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
R & L Transfer, Inc. v. Charles Bickford and Cleva Bickford
. The trial court concluded that R&L had been misled, and equity demanded the piercing of Bickford, Inc.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2268 - 2017-09-19
. The trial court concluded that R&L had been misled, and equity demanded the piercing of Bickford, Inc.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2268 - 2017-09-19