Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32711 - 32720 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 32711 - 32720 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 17, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35890 - 2009-03-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 17, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35890 - 2009-03-16
COURT OF APPEALS
to “avoid” T.M.’s “residence” borders on the frivolous. Further, given the trial court’s findings, this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91562 - 2013-01-14
to “avoid” T.M.’s “residence” borders on the frivolous. Further, given the trial court’s findings, this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91562 - 2013-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 4, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56315 - 2010-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 4, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56315 - 2010-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 26, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68296 - 2011-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 26, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68296 - 2011-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
§ 893.40 does not apply to this case because courts always retain the ability to enforce their orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72143 - 2011-10-11
§ 893.40 does not apply to this case because courts always retain the ability to enforce their orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72143 - 2011-10-11
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 24, 2012 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76796 - 2012-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 24, 2012 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76796 - 2012-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS
that directed sentencing courts “[i]n all criminal cases in which the offender is convicted of a felony in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40237 - 2009-08-31
that directed sentencing courts “[i]n all criminal cases in which the offender is convicted of a felony in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40237 - 2009-08-31
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 5, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29588 - 2007-07-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 5, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29588 - 2007-07-04
COURT OF APPEALS
intent. We agree. ¶7 In a written decision, the court stated: “[T]his is a case where the citing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35964 - 2009-03-23
intent. We agree. ¶7 In a written decision, the court stated: “[T]his is a case where the citing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35964 - 2009-03-23
COURT OF APPEALS
, a mistrial in a criminal case remains an extreme remedy. As the Court stated in Young, 470 U.S. at 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80927 - 2012-04-16
, a mistrial in a criminal case remains an extreme remedy. As the Court stated in Young, 470 U.S. at 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80927 - 2012-04-16