Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32721 - 32730 of 97795 for civil court case status online.
Search results 32721 - 32730 of 97795 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 30, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35061 - 2015-04-01
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 30, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35061 - 2015-04-01
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
involving Davis, the circuit court observed that while some of those cases were dismissed when
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98540 - 2014-09-15
involving Davis, the circuit court observed that while some of those cases were dismissed when
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98540 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
court observed that while some of those cases were dismissed when the witnesses failed to show up
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98540 - 2013-06-23
court observed that while some of those cases were dismissed when the witnesses failed to show up
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98540 - 2013-06-23
[PDF]
Elizabeth P. v. Mark R.F.
the parties that “it’s the court’s position that this judge can continue to hear this case in a fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12008 - 2017-09-21
the parties that “it’s the court’s position that this judge can continue to hear this case in a fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12008 - 2017-09-21
Elizabeth P. v. Mark R.F.
are relevant here. In determining whether a party is unfit, case law also permits the trial court to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12008 - 2005-03-31
are relevant here. In determining whether a party is unfit, case law also permits the trial court to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12008 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mary Lou McClain
. Eisenberg answered “yes” to the court’s questions of whether he had had enough time to discuss the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2920 - 2005-03-31
. Eisenberg answered “yes” to the court’s questions of whether he had had enough time to discuss the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2920 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mary Lou McClain
” to the court’s questions of whether he had had enough time to discuss the case and the consequences of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2920 - 2017-09-19
” to the court’s questions of whether he had had enough time to discuss the case and the consequences of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2920 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William R. Scott
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 11, 2001 Cornelia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3407 - 2017-09-19
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 11, 2001 Cornelia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3407 - 2017-09-19
State v. William R. Scott
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 11, 2001 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3407 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 11, 2001 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3407 - 2005-03-31
State v. Renee A. Fredel
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED June 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9725 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED June 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9725 - 2005-03-31