Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32721 - 32730 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 32721 - 32730 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 25, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
counsel’s performance was deficient, we need not address the prejudice prong of the ineffectiveness test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26907 - 2006-10-24
counsel’s performance was deficient, we need not address the prejudice prong of the ineffectiveness test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26907 - 2006-10-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
to support a conviction, “the test is whether this court can conclude that the trier of fact could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51566 - 2014-09-15
to support a conviction, “the test is whether this court can conclude that the trier of fact could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51566 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kenny L. Warren
). The manifest injustice test is satisfied by a showing that the defendant received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19322 - 2005-08-15
). The manifest injustice test is satisfied by a showing that the defendant received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19322 - 2005-08-15
State v. Catina A. McCoy
applied this balancing test to determine the legality of an on-the-street frisk of a person suspected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10784 - 2005-03-31
applied this balancing test to determine the legality of an on-the-street frisk of a person suspected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10784 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both prongs of the test if the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173389 - 2017-09-21
this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both prongs of the test if the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173389 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict, the test is whether the evidence adduced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476656 - 2022-01-27
the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict, the test is whether the evidence adduced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476656 - 2022-01-27
State v. Jeffrey Lilly
of the party against whom it is offered. The test is whether the resulting prejudice of relevant evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9492 - 2005-03-31
of the party against whom it is offered. The test is whether the resulting prejudice of relevant evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9492 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Industrial Risk Insurers v. American Eng’g Testing, Inc., 2009 WI App 62, ¶25, 318 Wis. 2d 148
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216470 - 2018-07-31
. See Industrial Risk Insurers v. American Eng’g Testing, Inc., 2009 WI App 62, ¶25, 318 Wis. 2d 148
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216470 - 2018-07-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 165 Wis. 2d 521, 526, 478 N.W.2d 294 (Ct. App. 1991). The test for vagueness is whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390576 - 2021-07-14
, 165 Wis. 2d 521, 526, 478 N.W.2d 294 (Ct. App. 1991). The test for vagueness is whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390576 - 2021-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
, 381. That test has been easily met here, as evidenced by the following testimony, which the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77920 - 2012-02-13
, 381. That test has been easily met here, as evidenced by the following testimony, which the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77920 - 2012-02-13