Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32721 - 32730 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 32721 - 32730 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Peter Bekersky
on the determination that Bekersky had not consistently asserted his innocence to counsel, and that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7779 - 2017-09-19
on the determination that Bekersky had not consistently asserted his innocence to counsel, and that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7779 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631927 - 2023-03-15
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631927 - 2023-03-15
Joseph E. Sabol v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
, “agricultural use” does not include personal gardens and hobby farms. Based on the record before us, we cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7070 - 2005-03-31
, “agricultural use” does not include personal gardens and hobby farms. Based on the record before us, we cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7070 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Barnekow
right to testify finds no support in the record and provides no basis for relief. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13453 - 2017-09-21
right to testify finds no support in the record and provides no basis for relief. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13453 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that the judgment should be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244231 - 2019-07-24
of the record, we conclude that the judgment should be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244231 - 2019-07-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Green could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592251 - 2022-11-22
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Green could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592251 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
found that Brophy was not indigent and entered its finding in the record the same day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61920 - 2014-09-15
found that Brophy was not indigent and entered its finding in the record the same day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61920 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
it. No. 2022AP535-CR 2 and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667652 - 2023-06-13
it. No. 2022AP535-CR 2 and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667652 - 2023-06-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
a rational, reasoned decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the record facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28732 - 2014-09-15
a rational, reasoned decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the record facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28732 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Vances H. Smith v. Gary R. McCaughtry
expunged from Smith’s record because Smith’s conduct in failing to stand for a cell count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10239 - 2017-09-20
expunged from Smith’s record because Smith’s conduct in failing to stand for a cell count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10239 - 2017-09-20