Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32721 - 32730 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 32721 - 32730 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Timothy G. Tackett
March 16, 2000. We affirm the trial court’s order. No. 02-0195 2 ¶2 Tackett was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4859 - 2017-09-19
March 16, 2000. We affirm the trial court’s order. No. 02-0195 2 ¶2 Tackett was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4859 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of fleeing from a police officer. The trial court imposed consecutive sentences resulting in an aggregate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31461 - 2008-01-14
of fleeing from a police officer. The trial court imposed consecutive sentences resulting in an aggregate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31461 - 2008-01-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for a new trial. He contends that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70432 - 2014-09-15
his motion for a new trial. He contends that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70432 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. On the morning of trial, Hvizdak—sixty-four years old and in compromised health—pled guilty to second-degree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137922 - 2017-09-21
. On the morning of trial, Hvizdak—sixty-four years old and in compromised health—pled guilty to second-degree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137922 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
concentration (PAC), fifth offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b) (2007- 08).1 He contends the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35761 - 2014-09-15
concentration (PAC), fifth offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b) (2007- 08).1 He contends the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35761 - 2014-09-15
Derek W. v. Susan K.B.
to a new trial. We disagree and affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2 Derek W. and Susan were living
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4074 - 2005-03-31
to a new trial. We disagree and affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2 Derek W. and Susan were living
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4074 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court was clearly wrong in changing the jury’s answers, as there was credible evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138013 - 2015-03-24
the trial court was clearly wrong in changing the jury’s answers, as there was credible evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138013 - 2015-03-24
[PDF]
State v. Encarnacion F., Jr.
not testify at trial. However, we conclude that the juvenile court could reasonably and fairly infer from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13813 - 2014-09-15
not testify at trial. However, we conclude that the juvenile court could reasonably and fairly infer from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13813 - 2014-09-15
Jon Lancaster, Inc. v. Floor Care Associates, Inc.
in the Lancaster matter. ¶6 The trial court granted summary judgment in the individual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6111 - 2005-03-31
in the Lancaster matter. ¶6 The trial court granted summary judgment in the individual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6111 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
request. We agree with the trial court that suppression was not required, and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33011 - 2014-09-15
request. We agree with the trial court that suppression was not required, and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33011 - 2014-09-15