Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32731 - 32740 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 32731 - 32740 of 63981 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the record facts, the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28732 - 2007-04-17
decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the record facts, the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28732 - 2007-04-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
plea. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181387 - 2017-09-21
plea. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181387 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
memoranda and the record, we affirm. Gary W. B. became subject to a WIS. STAT. ch. 54 guardianship
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132544 - 2017-09-21
memoranda and the record, we affirm. Gary W. B. became subject to a WIS. STAT. ch. 54 guardianship
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132544 - 2017-09-21
[MS WORD]
JC-1691: Temporary Restraining Order and Notice of Injunction Hearing (Child Abuse)
. Guardian Ad Litem (if any) 6. Law Enforcement 7. Other: CONFIDENTIAL COURT RECORD JC-1691, 09
/formdisplay/JC-1691.doc?formNumber=JC-1691&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-05-29
. Guardian Ad Litem (if any) 6. Law Enforcement 7. Other: CONFIDENTIAL COURT RECORD JC-1691, 09
/formdisplay/JC-1691.doc?formNumber=JC-1691&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-05-29
[PDF]
State v. Matthew J. Zei
postconviction testimony contained no justification for that withdrawal. The record as a whole, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3293 - 2017-09-19
postconviction testimony contained no justification for that withdrawal. The record as a whole, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3293 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 809.17(1) (2017-18).1 Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=323196 - 2021-01-14
2 809.17(1) (2017-18).1 Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=323196 - 2021-01-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231604 - 2019-01-03
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231604 - 2019-01-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Green could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592251 - 2022-11-22
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Green could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592251 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to support issuance of the injunction. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584871 - 2022-11-01
to support issuance of the injunction. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584871 - 2022-11-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the order may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215003 - 2018-07-03
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the order may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215003 - 2018-07-03