Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32741 - 32750 of 63243 for Motion for joint custody.

2009 WI 68
of the plaintiffs.[3] The circuit court granted the plaintiffs' motion under Wis. Stat. § 804.11(2) (2005-06)[4
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37324 - 2009-07-06

[PDF] WI 97
. This led to his four tort-based claims. ¶8 On November 1, 2001, Harley filed motions to dismiss
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29702 - 2014-09-15

Gail M. Washington v. Melvin K. Washington
Judge. The circuit court denied Gail M. Washington's post-divorce motion to grant her appreciation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17394 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
denying Russell Anderson’s motion for a supplemental evidentiary hearing. Based on the paper review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27531 - 2006-12-27

[PDF] M&I Bank South Central v. Neil C. Lofberg
, Inc. (Supervalu) appeals from a final order of the trial court denying its motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12752 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
a post-verdict motion to reduce the damages from $22,000 to $15,000 because of a provision in the rental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58134 - 2010-12-22

[PDF] NOTICE
).1 He also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion. Hernandez argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27936 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] ¶2015 WI APP 66
of the circuit court denying his motion to dismiss twenty-three counts charging him, under § 948.14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145361 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Bruce W. Ackerman
testimony. However, contradictory evidence was given at the postconviction motion hearing concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2650 - 2017-09-19

Roger T. Lambert v. Yvonne Hein
the Lamberts’ motion for summary judgment, and (3) erroneously ruled that the Lamberts’ decision to close
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12191 - 2005-03-31