Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32741 - 32750 of 63968 for records/1000.
Search results 32741 - 32750 of 63968 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Copus
” of the second (consecutive) ninety-day sentence. Nothing in the record, however, indicates that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12719 - 2017-09-21
” of the second (consecutive) ninety-day sentence. Nothing in the record, however, indicates that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12719 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192954 - 2017-09-21
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192954 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Donshea L. Trotter
the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors to be considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7144 - 2017-09-20
the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors to be considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7144 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of his right to file a response and has not responded. After reviewing the Record and counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922326 - 2025-03-05
of his right to file a response and has not responded. After reviewing the Record and counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922326 - 2025-03-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727998 - 2023-11-14
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727998 - 2023-11-14
COURT OF APPEALS
in the manner in which it did. The court was not obligated to accept Michael’s version of facts. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112237 - 2014-05-12
in the manner in which it did. The court was not obligated to accept Michael’s version of facts. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112237 - 2014-05-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, has not filed a response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192823 - 2017-09-21
, has not filed a response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192823 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James F. Emerich
the court: Just for the record, [the plea agreement] was made not knowing about the Wood County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2360 - 2017-09-19
the court: Just for the record, [the plea agreement] was made not knowing about the Wood County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2360 - 2017-09-19
State v. Matthew J. Zei
testimony contained no justification for that withdrawal. The record as a whole, including photographs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3293 - 2005-03-31
testimony contained no justification for that withdrawal. The record as a whole, including photographs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3293 - 2005-03-31
James Burkmaster v. Robert Wayne Heimerl
its discretion if it articulates its reasoning, relies on facts of record and the correct legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12158 - 2005-03-31
its discretion if it articulates its reasoning, relies on facts of record and the correct legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12158 - 2005-03-31