Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32751 - 32760 of 65726 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 32751 - 32760 of 65726 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
809.17(1) (2009-10).1 Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91323 - 2014-09-15
809.17(1) (2009-10).1 Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91323 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Clarence Pelton v. Division of Hearing and Appeals
, and made no objection on the record to the timing of receiving Riley’s statement. He has therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11718 - 2014-09-15
, and made no objection on the record to the timing of receiving Riley’s statement. He has therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11718 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
The record facts indicate that Heimerl saw Frier park her car in front of an alley entrance and remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29301 - 2014-09-15
The record facts indicate that Heimerl saw Frier park her car in front of an alley entrance and remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29301 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
exercises its discretion when it considers the relevant facts of record, applies the correct legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243491 - 2019-07-11
exercises its discretion when it considers the relevant facts of record, applies the correct legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243491 - 2019-07-11
State v. Hakam F. Hamdan
unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence complained of.” Id. at 622-23, 350 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12408 - 2005-03-31
unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence complained of.” Id. at 622-23, 350 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12408 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the circuit court was not clearly erroneous in so finding. On this record, we agree with the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357949 - 2021-04-20
, and the circuit court was not clearly erroneous in so finding. On this record, we agree with the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357949 - 2021-04-20
State v. Robert J. Sowle
denial of Sowle’s request to withdraw his plea. On appeal, Sowle contends that the record lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14141 - 2005-03-31
denial of Sowle’s request to withdraw his plea. On appeal, Sowle contends that the record lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14141 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gregory L. Cundy
, “[T]his Court’s review of the record reveals some doubt as to whether the stop actually was outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2590 - 2017-09-19
, “[T]his Court’s review of the record reveals some doubt as to whether the stop actually was outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2590 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
traffic or to comply with traffic regulations. Subsecs. 346.50(1)(a) and (b). ¶10 The record facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29301 - 2007-06-12
traffic or to comply with traffic regulations. Subsecs. 346.50(1)(a) and (b). ¶10 The record facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29301 - 2007-06-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of those things. The only evidence in the record in this case is that Mr. [Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303468 - 2020-11-17
of those things. The only evidence in the record in this case is that Mr. [Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303468 - 2020-11-17