Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32751 - 32760 of 64601 for divorce records/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to be—an accurate recording of his criminal conduct. The State’s expert testified she did not find any evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208330 - 2018-02-14

COURT OF APPEALS
merely “to reserve it for later use,” it would “strike” this testimony. My interpretation of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108051 - 2014-02-12

Lawrence Rayner v. Reeves Custom Builders, Inc.
The record is less clear as to the identity of the “Contractor.” On the one hand, the first page
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7100 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously exercised its discretion because it “failed to explain on the record why the DNA surcharge ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95671 - 2013-04-28

State v. Tyshion D. Davis
the presentence report prepared for the cocaine possession was in the record, it was not referenced by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26565 - 2006-09-25

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David J. Winkel
of the record, we approve and adopt the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law and determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20615 - 2017-09-21

State v. Alex Nieves
). To obtain relief on appeal, a defendant “must show some unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4690 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief, the [trial] court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89147 - 2012-11-13

State v. Jessie N. Pearson
was not asked any question about these potential witnesses. The record does not support Pearson’s long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5419 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to find that the record contains strong evidence of actual guilt as required under” Alford. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240190 - 2019-05-02