Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32751 - 32760 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 32751 - 32760 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial counsel was constitutionally defective for failing to object to the breach. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182419 - 2017-09-21
trial counsel was constitutionally defective for failing to object to the breach. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182419 - 2017-09-21
State v. William C. Rosenberg
] and of bail jumping in violation of Wis. Stat. § 946.49(1)(a). Rosenberg contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2764 - 2005-03-31
] and of bail jumping in violation of Wis. Stat. § 946.49(1)(a). Rosenberg contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2764 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. After a trial to the court, the court ruled that the Dorshas had proved their claim of adverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33850 - 2014-09-15
. After a trial to the court, the court ruled that the Dorshas had proved their claim of adverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33850 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel. Upon our review of the record, no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96145 - 2013-04-25
that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel. Upon our review of the record, no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96145 - 2013-04-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The trial court rejected Teresa’s argument that she had a right independent of Dean’s to challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147270 - 2017-09-21
. The trial court rejected Teresa’s argument that she had a right independent of Dean’s to challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147270 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Schweiner
and argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing an unduly harsh sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7515 - 2017-09-19
and argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing an unduly harsh sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7515 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Foster’s trial attorney did not object to any perceived or potential breach at sentencing; therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105319 - 2013-12-09
Foster’s trial attorney did not object to any perceived or potential breach at sentencing; therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105319 - 2013-12-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the circuit court indicating that he wished to withdraw his pleas because his trial counsel had allegedly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22
to the circuit court indicating that he wished to withdraw his pleas because his trial counsel had allegedly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a bench trial on Fabian’s petitions in September 2019. At the beginning of trial, the parties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640497 - 2023-04-05
a bench trial on Fabian’s petitions in September 2019. At the beginning of trial, the parties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640497 - 2023-04-05
[PDF]
State v. Christopher N. Pflieger
postconviction relief. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6921 - 2017-09-20
postconviction relief. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6921 - 2017-09-20