Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32761 - 32770 of 58277 for speedy trial.
Search results 32761 - 32770 of 58277 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
WI APP 200
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 KESSLER, J. Because each trial judge assigned to one of these cases properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26469 - 2014-09-15
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 KESSLER, J. Because each trial judge assigned to one of these cases properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26469 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Teahanna testified at the divorce trial that she regularly gave money to Charles to help pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851821 - 2024-09-19
, Teahanna testified at the divorce trial that she regularly gave money to Charles to help pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851821 - 2024-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
jury trial as to whether Francis was a child in need of protection or services, the jury heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007321 - 2025-09-10
jury trial as to whether Francis was a child in need of protection or services, the jury heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007321 - 2025-09-10
[PDF]
Ozga Enterprises, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
reversed the trial court order in this second enforcement action and reinstated the jury verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7797 - 2017-09-19
reversed the trial court order in this second enforcement action and reinstated the jury verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7797 - 2017-09-19
State v. Thomas G. Kramer
for a new trial because (1) pretrial statements made by Kramer should have been suppressed because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25442 - 2006-07-25
for a new trial because (1) pretrial statements made by Kramer should have been suppressed because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25442 - 2006-07-25
[PDF]
State v. Thomas G. Kramer
and remanded for a new trial because (1) pretrial statements made by No. 2005AP105-CR 2 Kramer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25442 - 2017-09-21
and remanded for a new trial because (1) pretrial statements made by No. 2005AP105-CR 2 Kramer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25442 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ozga Enterprises, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
reversed the trial court order in this second enforcement action and reinstated the jury verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7805 - 2017-09-19
reversed the trial court order in this second enforcement action and reinstated the jury verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7805 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 72
trial was held to determine the fair market value of Geise’s property before and after the taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114307 - 2017-09-21
trial was held to determine the fair market value of Geise’s property before and after the taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114307 - 2017-09-21
Lafayette County Human Services v. Gary A.S.
) violated the statute and his constitutional right to due process. Alternatively, he contends a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2340 - 2005-03-31
) violated the statute and his constitutional right to due process. Alternatively, he contends a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2340 - 2005-03-31
Ozga Enterprises, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
a floodplain.[3] On January 31, 1991, this court reversed the trial court order in this second enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7797 - 2005-03-31
a floodplain.[3] On January 31, 1991, this court reversed the trial court order in this second enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7797 - 2005-03-31