Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32771 - 32780 of 61985 for child support.

State v. Daymon D. Tate
. On May 16, 1997, Tate filed a postconviction motion seeking to withdraw his guilty plea. In support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13296 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was not credible on these points. Based on the circuit court’s findings, which are supported by the testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175368 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
would have supported his defense” and failing to request “an instruction on the lesser-included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410383 - 2021-08-17

KML Development Corporation v. Clyde Schreiber
to file a brief within ten days of the ruling to support their position that late fees could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3947 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Cleveland Brown, Jr.
supports his contention that the pleas were not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10523 - 2017-09-20

State v. Claus Bruestle
by analogy that our ruling in State v. Begicevic, 2004 WI App 57, 270 Wis. 2d 675, 678 N.W.2d 293, supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7455 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
for the rejection, we affirm if there is adequate support in the record. Busse v. City of Madison, 177 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33749 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] William J. Evers v. John A. Hager
with a number of unwarranted criminal charges." He lists twenty-two "predicate acts" to support the claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9687 - 2017-09-19

Wisconsin Power and Light Company v. Langlade County Board of Adjustment
) its decision was not supported by evidence; (3) its decision was unreasonable, arbitrary, oppressive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8922 - 2005-03-31

State v. Francis E. Altman
the State’s case,” the State’s own evidence at trial was sufficient to support Altman’s convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26043 - 2006-07-31