Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32781 - 32790 of 59723 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 32781 - 32790 of 59723 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. Shawn D. Knapp
necessarily included disruptive conduct, which Knapp claimed it would. There is nothing improper about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7754 - 2005-03-31
necessarily included disruptive conduct, which Knapp claimed it would. There is nothing improper about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7754 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence. We affirm. ¶2 To prove a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89195 - 2014-09-15
sentence. We affirm. ¶2 To prove a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89195 - 2014-09-15
State v. Shawn D. Knapp
necessarily included disruptive conduct, which Knapp claimed it would. There is nothing improper about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7753 - 2005-03-31
necessarily included disruptive conduct, which Knapp claimed it would. There is nothing improper about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7753 - 2005-03-31
R & R Logging v. Flannery Trucking, Inc.
that the policy unambiguously excludes coverage for the claim against Flannery. We therefore reverse and remand
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11906 - 2005-03-31
that the policy unambiguously excludes coverage for the claim against Flannery. We therefore reverse and remand
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11906 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
” unless the person provides a sufficient reason for failing to do so. Id. “[A]ny claim that could have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450404 - 2021-11-09
” unless the person provides a sufficient reason for failing to do so. Id. “[A]ny claim that could have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450404 - 2021-11-09
[PDF]
Harold E. Taves v. Michael T. Sullivan
waiver of his right to an administrative hearing. Taves claimed that a probation officer coerced him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12968 - 2017-09-21
waiver of his right to an administrative hearing. Taves claimed that a probation officer coerced him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12968 - 2017-09-21
State v. David W. Pender
surrounding the breath test were disputed at the suppression hearing. Pender claimed that he was not given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12582 - 2005-03-31
surrounding the breath test were disputed at the suppression hearing. Pender claimed that he was not given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12582 - 2005-03-31
Jimmy Bridges v. Gerald Berge
review of the claims in Bridges’ petition, but its analysis is not of record.[1] Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2761 - 2005-03-31
review of the claims in Bridges’ petition, but its analysis is not of record.[1] Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2761 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
there would be arguable merit to a claim that the sentence imposed on Cobbins was a misuse of discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95281 - 2014-09-15
there would be arguable merit to a claim that the sentence imposed on Cobbins was a misuse of discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95281 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
applies to a postconviction claim is a question of law entitled to independent review. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47253 - 2014-09-15
applies to a postconviction claim is a question of law entitled to independent review. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47253 - 2014-09-15