Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32791 - 32800 of 83395 for simple case search.

COURT OF APPEALS
that no exceptions to governmental immunity applied in this case and that Portage County was therefore immune
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116144 - 2014-07-02

COURT OF APPEALS
was that he was incarcerated, and therefore, under applicable Wisconsin case law, his substantive due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44175 - 2009-12-02

2006 WI 120
with the procedure followed by this court in prior cases, including Panzer v. Doyle, 2004 WI 52, 271 Wis. 2d 295, 680
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27020 - 2006-10-31

[PDF] State v. Brad S. Miller
2005 WI APP 114 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2004AP1406
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17812 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a mistrial because Wilcox testified that he “obtained the photograph of Jermaine Weston from other cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204737 - 2017-12-12

COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court assigned the case to the condemnation commissioners, which set a hearing on the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28611 - 2007-03-28

COURT OF APPEALS
The issue in this case is whether an insurance policy is contextually ambiguous. Our review, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37015 - 2009-07-06

WI App 35 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP3004 Complete Title ...
2013 WI App 35 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP3004 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92651 - 2013-03-26

COURT OF APPEALS
denying Kurtz’s motion for postconviction relief and remanded the case with directions directing the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39573 - 2009-08-27

State v. Ary L. Jones, Sr.
2002 WI App 208 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-2969-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4558 - 2005-03-31