Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3281 - 3290 of 10291 for ed.

State v. Darrell C. Solfest
(2nd ed. 1987) as: 1. to employ for some purpose; put into service; make use of: to use a knife. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12201 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
satisfies us that Ashanti N. had not “accept[ed] and exercise[d] … significant responsibility for the daily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111428 - 2014-04-29

[PDF] State v. Anthony Harris
and the State rely is no longer the law. Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 (1978), “expressly reject[ed]” so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9175 - 2017-09-19

State v. Robert E. Koutnik, Jr.
of conviction.” Id. at 638 (quoting ABA Standards for Criminal Justice, The Defense Function, § 4-4.1 (2d ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4114 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James R. Bolstad
. He also suggests that the prosecutor had a vendetta against him and "tr[i]ed every dirty trick she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8485 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] IW-1608; Temporary Physical Custody Request and Supplement (Chapter 48) - Indian Child Welfare Act
parents/caregivers intend(ed) to seriously hurt the child. One or both parents/caregivers lack
/formdisplay/IW-1608.pdf?formNumber=IW-1608&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-04-29

[PDF] NOTICE
that postconviction counsel had “fail[ed] to identify the court’s duty to advise the defendant personally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60766 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to distribute those beverages has been “terminated, cancelled, or [has not been] renew[ed]” may be compensated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219471 - 2018-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
with their regularly conducted practices.” Daniel D. Blinka, Wisconsin Evidence § 9015.1, at 896 (3d ed. 2008). ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145573 - 2015-08-04

[PDF] NOTICE
successfully extend[ed] its time to file a disapproving Resolution by 20 days.” Thus, the County concedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46056 - 2014-09-15