Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3281 - 3290 of 61013 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 3281 - 3290 of 61013 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
the jurisdiction of Juneau County, knowing full well that … it is quite likely that, at some point in time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86169 - 2005-04-15
the jurisdiction of Juneau County, knowing full well that … it is quite likely that, at some point in time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86169 - 2005-04-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
full well that … it is quite likely that, at some point in time in the future, Juneau County is going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86169 - 2014-09-15
full well that … it is quite likely that, at some point in time in the future, Juneau County is going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86169 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FA-4150V: Marital Settlement Order with Minor Children
or the other, but such a transfer requires a fully executed Quit Claim Deed and a Wisconsin Real Estate
/formdisplay/FA-4150V.pdf?formNumber=FA-4150V&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-02-25
or the other, but such a transfer requires a fully executed Quit Claim Deed and a Wisconsin Real Estate
/formdisplay/FA-4150V.pdf?formNumber=FA-4150V&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS
are not in dispute. In August 2002, DOT acquired by deed property belonging to the Meises for a road project.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
are not in dispute. In August 2002, DOT acquired by deed property belonging to the Meises for a road project.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
not be removed. The Affeldts claimed that any No. 2009AP2315 3 removal, cutting, damaging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52619 - 2014-09-15
not be removed. The Affeldts claimed that any No. 2009AP2315 3 removal, cutting, damaging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52619 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
not in the right-of-way and could not be removed. The Affeldts claimed that any removal, cutting, damaging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52619 - 2010-07-27
not in the right-of-way and could not be removed. The Affeldts claimed that any removal, cutting, damaging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52619 - 2010-07-27
2007 WI APP 135
to either property. Spencer’s property does not have access to the town road, but the deed reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28578 - 2007-07-11
to either property. Spencer’s property does not have access to the town road, but the deed reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28578 - 2007-07-11
[PDF]
WI APP 135
, but the deed reflects an easement across Kosir’s property. Spencer only knew of the lot being visited twice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28578 - 2014-09-15
, but the deed reflects an easement across Kosir’s property. Spencer only knew of the lot being visited twice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28578 - 2014-09-15
Robert J. Ollman v. Scott H. Pecor
of Deeds an “affidavit” indicating that in July 2002 he gave notice of his intent to exercise an option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25098 - 2006-05-09
of Deeds an “affidavit” indicating that in July 2002 he gave notice of his intent to exercise an option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25098 - 2006-05-09
[PDF]
State v. Gaspar S. Montoya
which Montoya claimed contained the previous victim’s underpants. A police officer testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16253 - 2017-09-21
which Montoya claimed contained the previous victim’s underpants. A police officer testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16253 - 2017-09-21