Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3281 - 3290 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 3281 - 3290 of 58458 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court erred when it entered default judgment at the grounds hearing and erred when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30305 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court erred when it entered default judgment at the grounds hearing and erred when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30305 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David Arredondo
his postconviction motion for a new No. 02-2361-CR 2 trial. 1 See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5626 - 2017-09-19
his postconviction motion for a new No. 02-2361-CR 2 trial. 1 See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5626 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
, trial counsel said that although the motion hearing had been scheduled, “Mr. Bohannon insisted that I
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125370 - 2014-10-23
, trial counsel said that although the motion hearing had been scheduled, “Mr. Bohannon insisted that I
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125370 - 2014-10-23
Kristine M. Downer-Beuthin v. John J. Beuthin
the trial court incorrectly applied Wis. Stat. § 767.255[2] when dividing the marital property. She also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7208 - 2005-03-31
the trial court incorrectly applied Wis. Stat. § 767.255[2] when dividing the marital property. She also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7208 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony K. Murphy
postconviction motion. Murphy claims that his trial lawyer was ineffective.[1] We affirm. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26099 - 2006-08-07
postconviction motion. Murphy claims that his trial lawyer was ineffective.[1] We affirm. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26099 - 2006-08-07
Shirley Daniels v. Kohl's Food Stores, Inc.
. The trial court dismissed the action based on Daniels’s failure to comply with the scheduling order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10393 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court dismissed the action based on Daniels’s failure to comply with the scheduling order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10393 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
resulting in death. The trial court imposed a twenty-two-year term of imprisonment, bifurcated as twelve
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138499 - 2015-03-24
resulting in death. The trial court imposed a twenty-two-year term of imprisonment, bifurcated as twelve
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138499 - 2015-03-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36014 - 2014-09-15
sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36014 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Arlene M. Wolski v. Chris R. Wolski
three years. Chris contends that the trial court erred in considering the entire length of both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10246 - 2017-09-20
three years. Chris contends that the trial court erred in considering the entire length of both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10246 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
postconviction motion. Nellum contends the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27378 - 2006-12-11
postconviction motion. Nellum contends the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27378 - 2006-12-11