Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32801 - 32810 of 38217 for ph d.

State v. Katrina French
ha[d] no possible relevance to the charge of which Pozo was convicted.” Pozo, 198 Wis. 2d at 714‑16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6187 - 2005-03-31

George J. and Mary V. Capoun Revocable Trust v. Aftab Ansari
they received was constitutionally inadequate. The supreme court recently explained: “‘[D]ue process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15456 - 2005-03-31

State v. Wilfred E. Tobias
of the taint of the illegal arrest. William D. Levinson, Supreme Court Review: Fourth Amendment — A Renewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8597 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
doing, the supreme court concluded: [D]ual credit is not permitted – that the time in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27382 - 2006-12-11

State v. Montgomery P. Avant
, trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to call these two other witnesses.[4] D. Appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6224 - 2005-03-31

State v. Armando P. Rodriguez
sexual assault as a habitual offender, in violation of §§ 940.225(2)(d) and 939.62(2), Stats.; criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13178 - 2005-03-31

State v. Homer L. Burks
in self-defense, but rather, by accident. As the State correctly argues: [D]efendant's argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10561 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
in annulment, divorce or legal separation. (d) The desirability that the custodian remain in the home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34201 - 2008-10-06

State v. Chad Everts
of Disciplinary Proceedings against Robert D. Zapf, 126 Wis. 2d 123, 127 N.W.2d 654 (1985). We note that, already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3758 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
-Plaintiff, v. Dean D. Krause, Defendant-Appellant, Daniel Krause and Todd M. Krause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35430 - 2009-02-02