Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32811 - 32820 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 32811 - 32820 of 63981 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
with Hanna. These findings are amply supported by the testimony of Hanna and a well-developed record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36325 - 2013-07-24
with Hanna. These findings are amply supported by the testimony of Hanna and a well-developed record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36325 - 2013-07-24
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[t]his is not a new factor claim,” and that the record does not support his position. Batson appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33531 - 2008-07-29
that “[t]his is not a new factor claim,” and that the record does not support his position. Batson appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33531 - 2008-07-29
Turi Jo Miller v. Terrance J. Halvorson
to evidence in the record. We agree and reverse the order. We remand for further proceedings consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21226 - 2006-02-06
to evidence in the record. We agree and reverse the order. We remand for further proceedings consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21226 - 2006-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237973 - 2019-03-26
a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237973 - 2019-03-26
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Barnekow
right to testify finds no support in the record and provides no basis for relief. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13453 - 2017-09-21
right to testify finds no support in the record and provides no basis for relief. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13453 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143850 - 2017-09-21
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143850 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Copus
” of the second (consecutive) ninety-day sentence. Nothing in the record, however, indicates that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12719 - 2017-09-21
” of the second (consecutive) ninety-day sentence. Nothing in the record, however, indicates that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12719 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462389 - 2021-12-14
an independent review of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462389 - 2021-12-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
should have held a hearing on his motion.2 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573219 - 2022-10-04
should have held a hearing on his motion.2 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573219 - 2022-10-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99313 - 2014-09-15
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99313 - 2014-09-15