Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32831 - 32840 of 38489 for t's.
Search results 32831 - 32840 of 38489 for t's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that preceded the traffic stop as follows: [I]t’s 11:50, ten minutes to midnight on a Friday night
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883294 - 2024-12-05
that preceded the traffic stop as follows: [I]t’s 11:50, ten minutes to midnight on a Friday night
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883294 - 2024-12-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, “‘[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997588 - 2025-08-20
, “‘[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997588 - 2025-08-20
State v. Richard M. Pease, Jr.
constitutionally defective. See Naupe v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, 269 (1959) (“[I]t is established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16288 - 2005-03-31
constitutionally defective. See Naupe v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, 269 (1959) (“[I]t is established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16288 - 2005-03-31
Darrell W. Griffin v. Jon E. Litscher
had applied the wrong legal standard, we stated that “[t]here is a significant distinction between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5409 - 2005-03-31
had applied the wrong legal standard, we stated that “[t]here is a significant distinction between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5409 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 28, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446954 - 2021-10-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 28, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446954 - 2021-10-28
[PDF]
State v. Marc Norfleet
or innocence of the defendant. Id. “[T]he trial judge’s role is limited to the relevance and admissibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3991 - 2017-09-20
or innocence of the defendant. Id. “[T]he trial judge’s role is limited to the relevance and admissibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3991 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in consciousness.” Coates answered, “[t]he way he was using it then, yes. That would meet the definition.” ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131025 - 2017-09-21
in consciousness.” Coates answered, “[t]he way he was using it then, yes. That would meet the definition.” ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131025 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 145
5 Given the stated testimony, we reject as clearly erroneous the trial court’s finding that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40218 - 2014-09-15
5 Given the stated testimony, we reject as clearly erroneous the trial court’s finding that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40218 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Giles L. Smith
that in § 980.05(1m). Section 51.20(5), STATS., provides: “[t]he hearings which are required to be held under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15160 - 2017-09-21
that in § 980.05(1m). Section 51.20(5), STATS., provides: “[t]he hearings which are required to be held under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15160 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the boys’ therapist which stated that seeing David in court “could be harmful,” that “[t]estifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54839 - 2014-09-15
the boys’ therapist which stated that seeing David in court “could be harmful,” that “[t]estifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54839 - 2014-09-15