Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32871 - 32880 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
Search results 32871 - 32880 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 3, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63408 - 2011-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 3, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63408 - 2011-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 15, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37585 - 2009-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 15, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37585 - 2009-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 28, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31964 - 2008-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 28, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31964 - 2008-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 23, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34954 - 2008-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 23, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34954 - 2008-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 21, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38005 - 2009-07-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 21, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38005 - 2009-07-20
COURT OF APPEALS
not understand that the court was not bound.” Id., ¶73. ¶6 In this case, the record shows that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32221 - 2008-03-31
not understand that the court was not bound.” Id., ¶73. ¶6 In this case, the record shows that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32221 - 2008-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 20, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49014 - 2010-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 20, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49014 - 2010-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, the court referenced the Bakers’ letter, which inquired whether it “[was] still the case” that they could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73091 - 2011-10-31
, the court referenced the Bakers’ letter, which inquired whether it “[was] still the case” that they could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73091 - 2011-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(1980). ¶8 In this case, the circuit court found that Konkol “yielded to the officer’s show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30099 - 2007-08-27
(1980). ¶8 In this case, the circuit court found that Konkol “yielded to the officer’s show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30099 - 2007-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
that had the Wisconsin court known that five years after sentencing in the Wisconsin case, Volpendesto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116162 - 2005-03-31
that had the Wisconsin court known that five years after sentencing in the Wisconsin case, Volpendesto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116162 - 2005-03-31