Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32881 - 32890 of 68502 for did.
Search results 32881 - 32890 of 68502 for did.
State v. Laura K-T.
this conduct did occur, you are to consider it as evidence only as to whether there is a substantial likelihood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6407 - 2005-03-31
this conduct did occur, you are to consider it as evidence only as to whether there is a substantial likelihood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6407 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 25
the March 26, 2004, hearing, Attorney Guenther spoke to his client J.J. on only one occasion. He did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35947 - 2014-09-15
the March 26, 2004, hearing, Attorney Guenther spoke to his client J.J. on only one occasion. He did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35947 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
when trial counsel did not move to dismiss count six on multiplicity or duplicity grounds.2 Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240533 - 2019-05-14
when trial counsel did not move to dismiss count six on multiplicity or duplicity grounds.2 Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240533 - 2019-05-14
State v. Donald Miller
beaten K.S. She later testified that K.S. told her that her boyfriend was mean to her, but that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14993 - 2005-03-31
beaten K.S. She later testified that K.S. told her that her boyfriend was mean to her, but that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14993 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Sandles
of the incident and because, he claims, the police did not have probable cause to believe contraband
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5719 - 2017-09-19
of the incident and because, he claims, the police did not have probable cause to believe contraband
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5719 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan L. Franklin
, 451 U.S. 477 (1981); and (2) he did not establish a “fair and just reason” to withdraw his pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14413 - 2014-09-15
, 451 U.S. 477 (1981); and (2) he did not establish a “fair and just reason” to withdraw his pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14413 - 2014-09-15
Burger King/Ameriking v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
the bathroom, “I picked them up and was taking them out to the kitchen and I over lifted them and did the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6268 - 2005-03-31
the bathroom, “I picked them up and was taking them out to the kitchen and I over lifted them and did the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6268 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
were passing “possible THC or a joint back and forth.” Passet did not have visual contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68030 - 2011-07-19
were passing “possible THC or a joint back and forth.” Passet did not have visual contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68030 - 2011-07-19
[PDF]
State v. Frederick F. Hafemann
of the vehicle, the officers had probable cause to open the trunk. Even if we did not conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8994 - 2017-09-19
of the vehicle, the officers had probable cause to open the trunk. Even if we did not conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8994 - 2017-09-19
Robert V. LaCombe v. Aurora Medical Group, Inc.
maintained that once the jury made a determination that Dr. Karls’ negligence did not cause the injuries
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6743 - 2005-03-31
maintained that once the jury made a determination that Dr. Karls’ negligence did not cause the injuries
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6743 - 2005-03-31