Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3291 - 3300 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3291 - 3300 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023-24)1 motion for relief. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1094550 - 2026-03-25
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023-24)1 motion for relief. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1094550 - 2026-03-25
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023-24)1 motion for relief. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1094550 - 2026-03-25
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023-24)1 motion for relief. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1094550 - 2026-03-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in custody from the date of his arrest until the date that he was revoked and ordered to serve his prison
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248856 - 2019-10-16
in custody from the date of his arrest until the date that he was revoked and ordered to serve his prison
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248856 - 2019-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Marathon County conviction, but he was not immediately taken into custody. On March 12, 2018, Simon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364296 - 2021-05-11
Marathon County conviction, but he was not immediately taken into custody. On March 12, 2018, Simon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364296 - 2021-05-11
[PDF]
Standard discovery protocol
) The Court will entertain motions to expand or increase the following limitations upon good cause shown
/services/attorney/docs/discprotoc.pdf - 2019-10-23
) The Court will entertain motions to expand or increase the following limitations upon good cause shown
/services/attorney/docs/discprotoc.pdf - 2019-10-23
State v. Stephen E. Lee
. The trial court denied the motion. The trial court held that Lee was in custody pursuant to a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14485 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court denied the motion. The trial court held that Lee was in custody pursuant to a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14485 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion to suppress both the fanny pack evidence and Goines’s custodial statement.6 ¶10 Goines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=979187 - 2025-07-08
the motion to suppress both the fanny pack evidence and Goines’s custodial statement.6 ¶10 Goines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=979187 - 2025-07-08
COURT OF APPEALS
by denying his pretrial motion to suppress statements. We reject Zarm’s arguments and affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28785 - 2007-04-23
by denying his pretrial motion to suppress statements. We reject Zarm’s arguments and affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28785 - 2007-04-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
County Circuit Court cases. Zarm argues the trial court erred by denying his pretrial motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28785 - 2014-09-15
County Circuit Court cases. Zarm argues the trial court erred by denying his pretrial motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28785 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
motions.1 The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52522 - 2014-09-15
motions.1 The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52522 - 2014-09-15