Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3291 - 3300 of 17236 for probate/1000.
Search results 3291 - 3300 of 17236 for probate/1000.
State v. Clarence E. Pelton
, contrary to § 946.49(1)(b), Stats. He was placed on two concurrent terms of probation. After his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11796 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to § 946.49(1)(b), Stats. He was placed on two concurrent terms of probation. After his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11796 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
after the revocation of his probation. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798393 - 2024-05-08
after the revocation of his probation. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798393 - 2024-05-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of probation. The circuit court accepted Witkowski’s plea and followed the parties’ joint recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261532 - 2020-05-21
of probation. The circuit court accepted Witkowski’s plea and followed the parties’ joint recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261532 - 2020-05-21
[PDF]
State v. Lloyd V. Pelly
on probation. We conclude that he is not entitled to the credit, and therefore reverse. No(s). 98-3137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14728 - 2017-09-21
on probation. We conclude that he is not entitled to the credit, and therefore reverse. No(s). 98-3137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14728 - 2017-09-21
State v. Lloyd V. Pelly
served while electronically monitored on probation. We conclude that he is not entitled to the credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14728 - 2005-03-31
served while electronically monitored on probation. We conclude that he is not entitled to the credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14728 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel arguing for probation rather than prison. ¶5 During argument, defense counsel again referenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=527537 - 2022-06-01
counsel arguing for probation rather than prison. ¶5 During argument, defense counsel again referenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=527537 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
years of probation. On count two, operating a vehicle without consent, the court imposed five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237779 - 2019-03-21
years of probation. On count two, operating a vehicle without consent, the court imposed five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237779 - 2019-03-21
[PDF]
WI App 66
On the child enticement count, King received a probation disposition of ten years, which began after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288462 - 2020-11-11
On the child enticement count, King received a probation disposition of ten years, which began after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288462 - 2020-11-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2017AP174-CR 2017AP175-CR 3 That list included three cases in which Sewell’s probation had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206462 - 2018-01-03
. 2017AP174-CR 2017AP175-CR 3 That list included three cases in which Sewell’s probation had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206462 - 2018-01-03
[PDF]
WI APP 88
to one count of third-degree sexual assault and the State agreed to recommend probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97997 - 2017-09-21
to one count of third-degree sexual assault and the State agreed to recommend probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97997 - 2017-09-21