Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32901 - 32910 of 75054 for judgment for us.

City of Milwaukee v. Clifford R. Negley
judgments finding that the Negleys violated certain City of Milwaukee building Code ordinances. The Negleys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11005 - 2009-07-21

[PDF] City of Milwaukee v. Clifford R. Negley
court judgments finding that the Negleys violated certain City of Milwaukee building Code ordinances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11005 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Frontsheet
("Washington"), seeks review of a published court of appeals decision affirming his judgment of conviction
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206747 - 2018-03-05

COURT OF APPEALS
years later, on November 10, 2010, Engerman, again pro se, used the October 5, 2007 default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82286 - 2012-05-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
order of the circuit court denying his motion to reopen a small claims default judgment against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82286 - 2014-09-15

William J. Keefe v. Ronald A. Arthur
. Arthur appeal from a trial court order entered February 26, 2004, vacating a previous order for judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19964 - 2005-10-17

[PDF] William J. Keefe v. Ronald A. Arthur
26, 2004, vacating a previous order for judgment that had been entered on May 12, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19964 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 63
) “change” to a “boundary” or “boundary line” as used in WIS. STAT. § 66.0307 means the physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=284656 - 2020-11-11

[PDF] , 2017AP909 and 2017AP1337-CR; added oral argument dates for October 2018
Whether a subcontractor’s services are subject to Wisconsin sales and use tax (see Wis. Stat. § 77.52
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217474 - 2018-08-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-RESPONDENT, V. TED LOPEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609438 - 2023-01-10