Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32901 - 32910 of 64953 for or b.
Search results 32901 - 32910 of 64953 for or b.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to avoid criminal penalties, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 943.201(2)(b) (2015-16), both counts as a repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190182 - 2017-09-21
to avoid criminal penalties, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 943.201(2)(b) (2015-16), both counts as a repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190182 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steve J. Polich
for an apportionment of costs. ¶35 LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J. (Concurring in part, dissenting in part). I join
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16779 - 2005-03-31
for an apportionment of costs. ¶35 LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J. (Concurring in part, dissenting in part). I join
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16779 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ricky J. Fortier
a controlled substance, cocaine, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 961.16(2)(b)(1) and 961.41(1m)(cm)(3) (1997-98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20809 - 2006-01-24
a controlled substance, cocaine, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 961.16(2)(b)(1) and 961.41(1m)(cm)(3) (1997-98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20809 - 2006-01-24
[PDF]
of appeal is necessary to give the court jurisdiction over the appeal.” WIS. STAT. § 809.10(1)(b)6.e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=310659 - 2020-12-03
of appeal is necessary to give the court jurisdiction over the appeal.” WIS. STAT. § 809.10(1)(b)6.e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=310659 - 2020-12-03
Leonard H. Jacob v. Russo Builders
provisions at issue later in its brief—“paragraphs 11(b)(4)(c) and 13.” Because paragraph 11(b)(4)(c) does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13434 - 2005-03-31
provisions at issue later in its brief—“paragraphs 11(b)(4)(c) and 13.” Because paragraph 11(b)(4)(c) does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13434 - 2005-03-31
Nicholas C. L. v. Julie R. L.
. 1995), we addressed the best-interest-of-the-child standard in the context of Wis. Stat. § 767.325(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25085 - 2006-06-27
. 1995), we addressed the best-interest-of-the-child standard in the context of Wis. Stat. § 767.325(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25085 - 2006-06-27
City of Madison v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
of Madison Police and Fire Commission, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 62.13(5)(b), alleging 15 counts of misconduct
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16527 - 2005-03-31
of Madison Police and Fire Commission, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 62.13(5)(b), alleging 15 counts of misconduct
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16527 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and: a. We have reached agreement with you on the amount of loss; or b. An appraisal award has been made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101798 - 2013-09-09
and: a. We have reached agreement with you on the amount of loss; or b. An appraisal award has been made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101798 - 2013-09-09
[PDF]
Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Wisconsin Education Association Council
of the petitioner-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Lester A. Pines and Tamara B. Packard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18836 - 2017-09-21
of the petitioner-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Lester A. Pines and Tamara B. Packard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18836 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Chaunte Ott
as a hearsay exception if Gwin were a co-conspirator under § 908.01(4)(b)5, STATS. We disagree. The mere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12141 - 2017-09-21
as a hearsay exception if Gwin were a co-conspirator under § 908.01(4)(b)5, STATS. We disagree. The mere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12141 - 2017-09-21