Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32911 - 32920 of 58937 for SMALL CLAIMS.

Barbara Gardner v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
the claimed error resulted in prejudice to the defendant. See Farrell v. John Deere Co., 151 Wis. 2d 45, 83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4084 - 2005-03-31

State v. Bernard J. McCoy
for postconviction relief. He claims that he was denied a fair trial when the trial court engaged in an extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3642 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Robert P. Goldstein v. Janusz Chiropractic Clinics
. Additionally, they claim that this case was not ripe for summary judgment disposition because expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12042 - 2017-09-21

State v. David J. Cleveland
. This court’s review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed question of fact and law. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16108 - 2005-03-31

Michael Mayek v. Cloverleaf Lakes Sanitary District #1
determined that he failed to comply with the requirements of Wis. Stat. § 66.60(12).[1] He claims that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16185 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Tamar T. Brown
. Brown now appeals. DISCUSSION A. Sufficiency of the Evidence. ¶8 Brown’s first claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20587 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. This influence was evidenced, Mednikow claimed, by extremely favorable lease and purchase terms, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32390 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Barbara Gardner v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
1 The jury awarded nothing to Barbara for her claim seeking compensation for the loss of aid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4084 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
claim for relief. Brown was not “resentenced.” The trial court has the authority to modify the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48431 - 2010-03-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was established. The court dismissed the complaint for “fail[ing] to state a claim for eviction” under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986689 - 2025-07-24