Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32911 - 32920 of 83320 for case search.
Search results 32911 - 32920 of 83320 for case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370363 - 2021-05-25
Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370363 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
in this case, this court lacks confidence that appointed counsel performed the requisite review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913090 - 2025-02-12
in this case, this court lacks confidence that appointed counsel performed the requisite review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913090 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the State asked Hill to read from the sentencing transcript in Clark’s escape case. Hill read the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84133 - 2014-09-15
, the State asked Hill to read from the sentencing transcript in Clark’s escape case. Hill read the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84133 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
in concluding he did not establish a prima facie case that his waiver of the right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29179 - 2014-09-15
in concluding he did not establish a prima facie case that his waiver of the right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29179 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and procedural due process, given that the Wisconsin Statutes require the State to prove the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93170 - 2014-09-15
and procedural due process, given that the Wisconsin Statutes require the State to prove the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93170 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mark Alan Szarkowitz
, again as a repeat offender. These cases were consolidated in January 1999 in Outagamie County. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6163 - 2005-03-31
, again as a repeat offender. These cases were consolidated in January 1999 in Outagamie County. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6163 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Douglas G. Skenandore
accordingly. ¶6 The facts in this case are undisputed; however, as the State points out, the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4410 - 2017-09-19
accordingly. ¶6 The facts in this case are undisputed; however, as the State points out, the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4410 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1) (2011-12).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96238 - 2013-04-29
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1) (2011-12).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96238 - 2013-04-29
Timothy M. Krause v. Donald Kaminski
The issue in this case is whether the trial court’s interpretation of § 10.80 ILHR was correct. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13798 - 2005-03-31
The issue in this case is whether the trial court’s interpretation of § 10.80 ILHR was correct. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13798 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731624 - 2023-11-22
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731624 - 2023-11-22