Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32921 - 32930 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 32921 - 32930 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Brown County v. Grey B.
which Grey’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim is based, the judgment and order are affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15726 - 2005-03-31
which Grey’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim is based, the judgment and order are affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15726 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The no-merit report first addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim that Freeman did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241516 - 2019-05-30
. The no-merit report first addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim that Freeman did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241516 - 2019-05-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be arguable merit to a claim that Williams’s guilty plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213769 - 2018-05-31
be arguable merit to a claim that Williams’s guilty plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213769 - 2018-05-31
State v. David W. Pender
in a light most favorable to Pender, and concludes that it does not establish grounds to claim a defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9739 - 2005-03-31
in a light most favorable to Pender, and concludes that it does not establish grounds to claim a defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9739 - 2005-03-31
Strasser & Yde v. Joel Larson
then filed a small claims action against Larson for unpaid legal services in the amount of $4,679.51
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2682 - 2005-03-31
then filed a small claims action against Larson for unpaid legal services in the amount of $4,679.51
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2682 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be arguable merit to a claim that R.H.’s original and successor trial counsel were ineffective by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962535 - 2025-05-30
be arguable merit to a claim that R.H.’s original and successor trial counsel were ineffective by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962535 - 2025-05-30
Larry Swanson v. School District of Butternut
claim is not barred by an election of remedies.[1] We conclude that the agreement is unambiguous. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12556 - 2005-03-31
claim is not barred by an election of remedies.[1] We conclude that the agreement is unambiguous. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12556 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statutory costs based on claims of unjust enrichment and quantum merit. On appeal, Daley argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610808 - 2023-01-18
statutory costs based on claims of unjust enrichment and quantum merit. On appeal, Daley argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610808 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be arguable merit to a claim that R.H.’s original and successor trial counsel were ineffective by failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962535 - 2025-05-30
be arguable merit to a claim that R.H.’s original and successor trial counsel were ineffective by failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962535 - 2025-05-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245138 - 2019-08-12
be arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245138 - 2019-08-12