Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32921 - 32930 of 64166 for records.
Search results 32921 - 32930 of 64166 for records.
State v. Robert B. Frier
of Frier’s records, Dr. Sherry concluded that Frier remained a significant risk for reoffending because Frier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5377 - 2005-03-31
of Frier’s records, Dr. Sherry concluded that Frier remained a significant risk for reoffending because Frier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5377 - 2005-03-31
Linda S. Painter v. William D. Whitnall
the record that a right to sue letter was issued to Painter. The court also questioned whether an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3251 - 2005-03-31
the record that a right to sue letter was issued to Painter. The court also questioned whether an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3251 - 2005-03-31
Biersdorf & Associates v. Spire Capital Corporation
appeal from that judgment, this court concluded that the record supported Biersdorf’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7201 - 2005-03-31
appeal from that judgment, this court concluded that the record supported Biersdorf’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7201 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and an independent review of the record as 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=580440 - 2022-10-25
, and an independent review of the record as 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=580440 - 2022-10-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of mandamus. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070339 - 2026-02-03
of mandamus. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070339 - 2026-02-03
State v. Devin D. Lenoir
to raise a question of fact, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12625 - 2005-03-31
to raise a question of fact, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12625 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the entire record as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that counsel shall be allowed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238272 - 2019-03-27
reviewing the entire record as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that counsel shall be allowed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238272 - 2019-03-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Wis. Stat. § 805.16(1). The verdict in this case was rendered in 1996, and the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34836 - 2008-12-08
. See Wis. Stat. § 805.16(1). The verdict in this case was rendered in 1996, and the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34836 - 2008-12-08
CA Blank Order
so. Upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude that no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128261 - 2014-11-18
so. Upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude that no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128261 - 2014-11-18
State v. Warren J. Pik
. And, therefore, the Court will consider the entire record of both dates. And we would start with the plea date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8992 - 2005-03-31
. And, therefore, the Court will consider the entire record of both dates. And we would start with the plea date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8992 - 2005-03-31