Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32921 - 32930 of 47000 for shows.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not establish a new factor. 3 We agree that Volpendesto did not show facts “highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116162 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. John R. Martin
N.W.2d 309, 314 (Ct. App. 1987). The defendant bears the burden of showing, from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11310 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Auston J.S.
placement is appropriate. ¶10 The record shows that Auston was disruptive in class, threw a book
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7665 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
546. Gembicki has not 1 The sample showed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80828 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Robert A. Allen
by the delay. In the absence of a showing of extraordinary circumstances, an outright dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5814 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] County of Fond du Lac v. Kevin C. Derksen
showing that he is a responsible driver, pays his fees, and drives responsibly. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4183 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Birdell A. Peterson
the show." Peterson also acquiesced to the theory of defense proposed by his trial attorney. At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10109 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that testing of his oral swab is relevant because it would show that his “salivary DNA” was not present
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199232 - 2017-10-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
his claim on appeal. ¶3 In order to withdraw a plea after sentencing, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97639 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
concludes that there would be no merit in challenging the plea colloquy. The record shows that the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102775 - 2017-09-21