Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32931 - 32940 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
Search results 32931 - 32940 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
of $37,650 from Schmitz. Schmitz contends that the circuit court improperly resolved the case by summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34412 - 2008-10-28
of $37,650 from Schmitz. Schmitz contends that the circuit court improperly resolved the case by summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34412 - 2008-10-28
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 7, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118853 - 2006-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 7, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118853 - 2006-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS
objected on these grounds nor did she bring pertinent cases to the trial court’s attention. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69406 - 2011-08-08
objected on these grounds nor did she bring pertinent cases to the trial court’s attention. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69406 - 2011-08-08
COURT OF APPEALS
)5. (2011-12). [1] See Wis. Stat. § 973.13 (2011-12) (“In any case where the court imposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127192 - 2014-11-11
)5. (2011-12). [1] See Wis. Stat. § 973.13 (2011-12) (“In any case where the court imposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127192 - 2014-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS
to make intoxication an issue in the case. Id. at 485-86. Our supreme court has clarified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69575 - 2011-08-15
to make intoxication an issue in the case. Id. at 485-86. Our supreme court has clarified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69575 - 2011-08-15
COURT OF APPEALS
explain its reasons for both decisions, we reverse and remand the case to the circuit court for further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53671 - 2010-08-24
explain its reasons for both decisions, we reverse and remand the case to the circuit court for further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53671 - 2010-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
Quiles’s conviction. We affirm the trial court judgment dismissing the case against Quiles. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88748 - 2012-10-30
Quiles’s conviction. We affirm the trial court judgment dismissing the case against Quiles. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88748 - 2012-10-30
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 23, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47255 - 2010-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 23, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47255 - 2010-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 29, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92146 - 2013-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 29, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92146 - 2013-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 21, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63041 - 2011-04-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 21, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63041 - 2011-04-20