Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32931 - 32940 of 59511 for quit claim deed.
Search results 32931 - 32940 of 59511 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
claims the public defender did not explain to him “the dangers or disadvantages of representation,” he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26653 - 2006-10-02
claims the public defender did not explain to him “the dangers or disadvantages of representation,” he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26653 - 2006-10-02
State v. David A. Achenbach
credit and an order clarifying the record. Achenbach claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9647 - 2005-03-31
credit and an order clarifying the record. Achenbach claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9647 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and foreclosure costs he claims she owes based, in part, on an August 2011 stipulation. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90023 - 2014-09-15
and foreclosure costs he claims she owes based, in part, on an August 2011 stipulation. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90023 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kenneth Jordan v. Stephen M. Puckett
state and federal courts in Wisconsin have previously rejected claims that changes in the rules
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13098 - 2017-09-21
state and federal courts in Wisconsin have previously rejected claims that changes in the rules
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13098 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Allan R. Washachek
2 claims the trial court violated his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2526 - 2017-09-19
2 claims the trial court violated his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2526 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
filed the underlying WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion for plea withdrawal, claiming his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123043 - 2014-10-07
filed the underlying WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion for plea withdrawal, claiming his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123043 - 2014-10-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). In Eskridge’s WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion, he claimed that his trial attorneys, Ronald E. Langford and Bradley
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107652 - 2017-09-21
). In Eskridge’s WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion, he claimed that his trial attorneys, Ronald E. Langford and Bradley
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107652 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Elmer W. VanBoven
Finally, we do not address VanBoven’s claim that his constitutional rights were violated by the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15241 - 2017-09-21
Finally, we do not address VanBoven’s claim that his constitutional rights were violated by the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15241 - 2017-09-21
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
% of the initial confinement time before raising a claim based on a change in a sentencing law, it cannot fairly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
% of the initial confinement time before raising a claim based on a change in a sentencing law, it cannot fairly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
Ronald S. Schilling v. Sandra Sweney
dismissing his certiorari action for failure to file a brief. He claims the dismissal was an erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14288 - 2005-03-31
dismissing his certiorari action for failure to file a brief. He claims the dismissal was an erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14288 - 2005-03-31