Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32941 - 32950 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 32941 - 32950 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Theodore F. Maday, Jr.
or dismissing the case on grounds that the statute is unconstitutional as applied. ¶2 When Maday pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3957 - 2017-09-20
or dismissing the case on grounds that the statute is unconstitutional as applied. ¶2 When Maday pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3957 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Timothy M. Secrist
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2476-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12944 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2476-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12944 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645724 - 2023-04-19
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645724 - 2023-04-19
State v. Matthew S. Carlson
in the case was scheduled for August 27, 2002. On August 6, defense counsel moved to adjourn the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7164 - 2005-03-31
in the case was scheduled for August 27, 2002. On August 6, defense counsel moved to adjourn the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7164 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Milwaukee v. John P. Baumgartner
-2704 2 STAT. § 346.63(1)(a) (1999-2000). 2 In another case charging Baumgartner, the County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4469 - 2017-09-19
-2704 2 STAT. § 346.63(1)(a) (1999-2000). 2 In another case charging Baumgartner, the County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4469 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gamel S. Hegwood
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The underlying facts of this case are somewhat involved. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5491 - 2005-03-31
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The underlying facts of this case are somewhat involved. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5491 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
or sentence modification. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2 This case involves two consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47677 - 2014-09-15
or sentence modification. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2 This case involves two consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47677 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a property division allocated to a former spouse in an earlier divorce judgment.5 See, e.g., cases cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59402 - 2014-09-15
of a property division allocated to a former spouse in an earlier divorce judgment.5 See, e.g., cases cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59402 - 2014-09-15
State v. Andrew S. Miller
2003 WI App 74 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0851-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5097 - 2005-03-31
2003 WI App 74 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0851-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5097 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 135
2007 WI App 135 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP1691 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28578 - 2007-07-11
2007 WI App 135 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP1691 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28578 - 2007-07-11