Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32951 - 32960 of 82962 for case codes/1000.
Search results 32951 - 32960 of 82962 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
, and whether the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4655 - 2017-09-19
, and whether the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4655 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gary L. Kluck
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9520 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9520 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Bruce B. Jacobson
2005 WI 76 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2004AP753-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18564 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI 76 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2004AP753-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18564 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
The State stipulates to Kohel’s recitation of the history of the case as set forth in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36725 - 2014-09-15
The State stipulates to Kohel’s recitation of the history of the case as set forth in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36725 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
as the postconviction court/judge. No. 2008AP820-CR 3 ¶4 In this case, as in Reynolds, the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36732 - 2014-09-15
as the postconviction court/judge. No. 2008AP820-CR 3 ¶4 In this case, as in Reynolds, the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36732 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Chester Gulan
application of the three sentencing factors, in which a circuit court simply described the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24516 - 2017-09-21
application of the three sentencing factors, in which a circuit court simply described the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24516 - 2017-09-21
County of Milwaukee v. John P. Baumgartner
-2000).[2] In another case charging Baumgartner, the County also appeals from the trial court’s sua
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4470 - 2005-03-31
-2000).[2] In another case charging Baumgartner, the County also appeals from the trial court’s sua
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4470 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 83
2012 WI App 83 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2011AP1922-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83719 - 2014-09-15
2012 WI App 83 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2011AP1922-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83719 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 402, 422 n.18 (“no case can be found holding standing to be a jurisdictional prerequisite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169614 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 402, 422 n.18 (“no case can be found holding standing to be a jurisdictional prerequisite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169614 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
). The ordinance was therefore unconstitutional and unenforceable. The case was returned to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33787 - 2014-09-15
). The ordinance was therefore unconstitutional and unenforceable. The case was returned to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33787 - 2014-09-15