Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32961 - 32970 of 65039 for timed.
Search results 32961 - 32970 of 65039 for timed.
William B. Burke v. Patricia L. Burke
William and Patricia L. Burke were divorced by a judgment dated January 20, 1999. At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15459 - 2005-03-31
William and Patricia L. Burke were divorced by a judgment dated January 20, 1999. At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15459 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
calling her phone “over 100 time[s] a day” and threatening her life for failing to return his calls
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578131 - 2022-10-18
calling her phone “over 100 time[s] a day” and threatening her life for failing to return his calls
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578131 - 2022-10-18
[PDF]
State v. Reuben G. May
days in the county jail with credit for time served. In January 1998, May was charged with three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5828 - 2017-09-19
days in the county jail with credit for time served. In January 1998, May was charged with three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5828 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kristin J.
, at which time Kristin J. appeared. At the hearing, Kristin J. indicated her desire to contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3900 - 2005-03-31
, at which time Kristin J. appeared. At the hearing, Kristin J. indicated her desire to contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3900 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jewel C.
had informed Jewel at the time of the pregnancy that he was not the father. The State objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4094 - 2005-03-31
had informed Jewel at the time of the pregnancy that he was not the father. The State objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4094 - 2005-03-31
Patricia A. Andreshak v. Chris Childrey
for its failure to timely answer the third-party complaint. C&I argues that its neglect was excusable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11042 - 2005-03-31
for its failure to timely answer the third-party complaint. C&I argues that its neglect was excusable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11042 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey L. Neuman
) (defendant may not receive credit for time spent serving a sentence on an unrelated charge). With that block
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4239 - 2005-03-31
) (defendant may not receive credit for time spent serving a sentence on an unrelated charge). With that block
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4239 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Henry F. Pocan
parole was revoked. He was placed in the Wisconsin Resource Center approximately four times because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13875 - 2014-09-15
parole was revoked. He was placed in the Wisconsin Resource Center approximately four times because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13875 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that an appeal “shall be taken within a reasonable time, as provided by the rules of the board of adjustment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258004 - 2020-04-15
that an appeal “shall be taken within a reasonable time, as provided by the rules of the board of adjustment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258004 - 2020-04-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“believes that Murrell wasn’t even in the nightclub at the time of the shooting”; Bentley saw Buck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213760 - 2018-06-05
“believes that Murrell wasn’t even in the nightclub at the time of the shooting”; Bentley saw Buck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213760 - 2018-06-05