Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32981 - 32990 of 50536 for our.

State v. Robert J. Pettis
. Our review of the record reveals that the trial court touched upon the requisite topics in taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12578 - 2005-03-31

Donald Lee v. Jeffrey Endicott
accepts our standard of review. He argues that the committee's decision was arbitrary, capricious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7934 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
our discussion by noting the significance of a delinquency determination on the life of a juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86474 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to revoke Robinson’s extended No. 2016AP1507 2 supervision. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218461 - 2018-08-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for an additional 428 days of sentencing credit. Upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581342 - 2022-10-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to the sufficiency of the evidence, the sentences, or counsel’s performance would lack arguable merit. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=557216 - 2022-08-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for initial commitment. Upon our independent review of the record, we have found no other arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189492 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] William Trussoni v. Fred J. Pedretti
is therefore entitled to costs and reasonable attorney fees from Lunde. ¶11 Our decision on the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7025 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
. Id. at 555-56. We reject Mayan’s suggestion that our holding in Fleming is limited only to those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28503 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
to the complaint does not undermine our confidence in the outcome. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36216 - 2014-09-15