Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 331 - 340 of 6317 for 208.

[PDF] State v. Carla L. Oglesby
ex rel. Jacobus v. State, 208 Wis. 2d 39, 48, 559 N.W.2d 900 (1997). In Lipke, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24803 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Philip T. Sliwinski v. The Board of Fire and Police Commissioners of the City of Milwaukee
, the videotape in the Record identified as from the surveillance of Room 208 shows Bonilla walking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21576 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, 270 Wis. 2d at 560, 678 N.W.2d at 208. We do not, however, require the circuit court to explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49039 - 2010-04-19

Holly R. v. Joseph T.
to a jury trial is N.E. v. DHSS, 122 Wis. 2d 198, 208, 361 N.W.2d 693 (1985), where the court said: We hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2663 - 2005-03-31

State v. Shawn E. Braxton
. Liebnitz, 231 Wis. 2d 272, 603 N.W.2d 208 (1999), controls. We affirm. ¶2 Braxton’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2900 - 2005-03-31

Terry J. Beaudoin v. James S. Beaudoin
is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. Beaupre v. Airriess, 208 Wis. 2d 238, 243, 560 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2425 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. We are bound by this holding. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 185–190, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206020 - 2017-12-19

James Logic v. City of South Milwaukee Board of Canvassers
“the purpose of the rule.” Jadair Inc. v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 209 Wis. 2d 187, 208, 211–213, 562 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7567 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” State v. Secrist, 224 Wis. 2d 201, 208, 589 N.W.2d 387 (1999). This court “consistently follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229383 - 2018-12-11

COURT OF APPEALS
that a different result would be reached in a trial. State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 473-74, 561 N.W.2d 707
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34365 - 2008-10-20