Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 331 - 340 of 5076 for hits.
Search results 331 - 340 of 5076 for hits.
COURT OF APPEALS
or her vehicle was safe for travel after hitting an animal as large as a deer. Johns did not observe any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139955 - 2015-04-21
or her vehicle was safe for travel after hitting an animal as large as a deer. Johns did not observe any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139955 - 2015-04-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
her vehicle “hit” the center line on one occasion and dismisses the fact that she slammed on her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28030 - 2007-02-06
her vehicle “hit” the center line on one occasion and dismisses the fact that she slammed on her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28030 - 2007-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was associated with a vehicle that may have been involved in a hit and run about half an hour earlier. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193553 - 2017-09-21
was associated with a vehicle that may have been involved in a hit and run about half an hour earlier. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193553 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
The first impact caused Willeford to hit the headrest of the front passenger seat. In the second impact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108938 - 2014-03-11
The first impact caused Willeford to hit the headrest of the front passenger seat. In the second impact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108938 - 2014-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
its motion for reconsideration of the court’s denial of restitution to the victim of a hit and run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102338 - 2013-09-25
its motion for reconsideration of the court’s denial of restitution to the victim of a hit and run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102338 - 2013-09-25
COURT OF APPEALS
] point of view, it looks like she hits the centerline. That is what it looks like on the tape. [Rose’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113387 - 2014-06-03
] point of view, it looks like she hits the centerline. That is what it looks like on the tape. [Rose’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113387 - 2014-06-03
State v. Shamseldin Ali Abdelwarress
]: Did you hit her with an ice scraper? THE DEFENDANT: But there was no intent to bodily harm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9685 - 2005-03-31
]: Did you hit her with an ice scraper? THE DEFENDANT: But there was no intent to bodily harm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9685 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward F. Topping
that she was afraid Topping was going to hit her, the prosecutor read this sentence from her statement: “I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3633 - 2005-03-31
that she was afraid Topping was going to hit her, the prosecutor read this sentence from her statement: “I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3633 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James P. Henderson
Henderson hit Jennings in the head with a baseball bat after Jennings fell down. ¶4 Defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2249 - 2017-09-19
Henderson hit Jennings in the head with a baseball bat after Jennings fell down. ¶4 Defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2249 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
, purportedly in self-defense, and did not mean to hit Labourgeois. � The trial court held as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57751 - 2014-09-15
, purportedly in self-defense, and did not mean to hit Labourgeois. � The trial court held as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57751 - 2014-09-15