Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3301 - 3310 of 69903 for his.
Search results 3301 - 3310 of 69903 for his.
[PDF]
Gregory K. Scott v.
, 1997, Gregory K. Scott petitioned for the reinstatement of his license to practice law in Wisconsin
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16846 - 2017-09-21
, 1997, Gregory K. Scott petitioned for the reinstatement of his license to practice law in Wisconsin
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16846 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
denying a motion to correct or vacate his sentence. He contends that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93261 - 2014-09-15
denying a motion to correct or vacate his sentence. He contends that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93261 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ferdinand Walters
appeals from an order denying his motion for relief from judgment. The issue is whether Walters received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10796 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying his motion for relief from judgment. The issue is whether Walters received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10796 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert D. Hendrix
court. Hendrix argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas in order to correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9644 - 2017-09-19
court. Hendrix argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas in order to correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9644 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert D. Hendrix
a postconviction order entered by the trial court. Hendrix argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9644 - 2005-03-31
a postconviction order entered by the trial court. Hendrix argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9644 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 37
. No. 2005AP2393 2 ¶1 VERGERONT, J. Danny G. Harrell appeals the circuit court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31688 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2005AP2393 2 ¶1 VERGERONT, J. Danny G. Harrell appeals the circuit court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31688 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 37
order denying his motion for a new trial under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (2003-04).[1] He contends the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31688 - 2008-03-18
order denying his motion for a new trial under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (2003-04).[1] He contends the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31688 - 2008-03-18
Frontsheet
reinstatement to the practice of law and upon his practice of law following his reinstatement. ¶2 After
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115395 - 2014-06-23
reinstatement to the practice of law and upon his practice of law following his reinstatement. ¶2 After
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115395 - 2014-06-23
State v. Leamon Hoover
safety, see Wis. Stat. § 941.30(1), and from the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14784 - 2005-03-31
safety, see Wis. Stat. § 941.30(1), and from the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14784 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
arguments on appeal: (1) his right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) unreasonable discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133722 - 2017-09-21
arguments on appeal: (1) his right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) unreasonable discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133722 - 2017-09-21