Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3301 - 3310 of 6638 for mix.

State v. Daniel Aguilar
WI App 2, ¶49, 232 Wis. 2d 62, 606 N.W.2d 207 (1999). Whether counsel was ineffective is a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15190 - 2005-03-31

Dane County Department of Human Services v. Kenneth M.
Whether trial counsel provided ineffective assistance is a mixed question of law and fact. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20284 - 2005-11-16

[PDF] State v. Floyd Carter
assistance of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216, 395 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16079 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
burden of proving Mary incompetent to refuse medication is a mixed question of law and fact. K.N.K. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107371 - 2014-01-27

COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s actions constitute ineffective assistance is a mixed question of law and fact. State v. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88800 - 2012-10-29

[PDF] State v. Simone S. Russell
presents a mixed question of law and fact. State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis. 2d 587, 609, 516 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5232 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
This court’s review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed question of fact and law. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161245 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Lawrence A. Smith v. Dodgeville Mutual Insurance Company
is a mixed question of law and fact which is generally left to the jury, Morgan v. Pennsylvania General
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11735 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
In reviewing a motion to suppress an inculpatory statement, our review is mixed. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47043 - 2010-02-16

[PDF] State v. Xavier B. Smith
ineffective assistance is a mixed question of law and fact. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21024 - 2017-09-21