Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33001 - 33010 of 65726 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 33001 - 33010 of 65726 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
not to do. After reviewing the record and 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026585 - 2025-10-22
not to do. After reviewing the record and 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026585 - 2025-10-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
erred in denying her motion for sentence adjustment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017155 - 2025-10-01
erred in denying her motion for sentence adjustment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017155 - 2025-10-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=425984 - 2021-09-14
independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=425984 - 2021-09-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction and an order denying her postconviction motion.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241549 - 2019-05-30
of conviction and an order denying her postconviction motion.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241549 - 2019-05-30
CA Blank Order
denying part of the sentence credit he requested. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96330 - 2013-05-07
denying part of the sentence credit he requested. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96330 - 2013-05-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104919 - 2017-09-21
-CRNM 2 review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104919 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130018 - 2014-11-24
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130018 - 2014-11-24
[PDF]
State v. Donald T. Fravert
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13984 - 2014-09-15
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13984 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
not to do. After reviewing the record and 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026585 - 2025-10-22
not to do. After reviewing the record and 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026585 - 2025-10-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was advised of her right to respond, and she has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456076 - 2021-11-23
was advised of her right to respond, and she has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456076 - 2021-11-23